Solid VorpX shows recommended default setting. This bar chart shows the comparative difference.

Relative performance vs 2D = 69/248*100 = 28% of 2D perfromance Relative performance vs 2D = 55/248*100 = 22% of 2D perfromance Not really playable = ~69 fps GPU sync FAST (stuttery, not recommended) VorpX = Playable ~ 55 fps GPU sync SAFE (recommended/default), ASW off Relative performance vs 2D = 96/248*100 = 39% of 2D perfromance Relative performance vs 2D = 128/248*100 = 52% of 2D perfromance So let's begin: to start off, I did some preliminary benchmarks with the only modern game I currently have installed on my system: We Happy Few, so please take with a grain of salt - these are my personal opinions in this specific scenario. ation-thr/Įven in the past years, we have had games scaling past 4, 6, and even 8 cores such with Horizon Zero Dawn etc.Įven our old friend GTA5 will scale decently up to 10c20T, and likely beyond: I think this will become more important as the next gen consoles are released with powerful 8c16t Zen cores, while we may well be left behind due to the '3D Vision 3core CPU bug'. In this thread, I hope we can come together here to discuss how to decrease performance penalties.

Unfortunately, a shared nemesis has always been the performance cost we needed to pay. We are all Stereo3D fans here, and we all want to get the best out of our setups.

Ps3 eye driver windows 10 reddit